Talk Conspiracy Member Posts

 

p1's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing


No Profile Picture uploaded

Team: Liverpool


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone: (GMT) Western Europe Time, London, Lisbon, Casablanca




p1's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To p1's Posts

 

 

To p1's last 5 rumours posts

 

To p1's last 5 rumour replies

 

p1's rumours posts with other poster's replies to p1's rumours posts

 

09 Dec 2017 16:08:42
Stumbled across this found interesting about ancient history and secrets were not told about.

Archaeological Discoveries That Are Way Too Controversial for Todays Scientists

p1

 

 

26 Nov 2017 19:24:23
Hi ed pretty sure you don't believe about flat earth. Neither do I but every now and then I watch a video which gets me thinking. I've now seen a few about fake direct flights which either get cancelled or no plane or passengers can be found at airports. Just wondered what your thoughts and anyone else's was regarding this matter and flight paths which don't make any sense on a globe.

p1

{Ed033's Note - We're told that the Earth is spinning at 1000 miles an hour. Try working out how long it should take you to reach a location 1000 miles away at 500 mph with the Earth spinning towards you and then try working out how long it should take you to reach a location 1000 miles away at 500 mph with the Earth spinning away from you.

Now if you look at how long it really takes in a plane ride, you'll find it doesn't work out as above.


1.) 26 Nov 2017 22:33:31
I think you'll find that everything within the Earths radius is bound by gravity, which means everything with in the Earths radius, is traveling with the Earth.

If you let go of a Helium balloon on a completely still day (no wind), it's not going to disappear behind you at 1000mph, it's going to just go up.

Flight paths are to designed to evade as much turbulent air as possible. It may look like you can just fly from A to B, but you will need to go via C, because the air pressure is vastly different. To explain it further, I'd need to understand climatology a bit more but that's the very basics.

{Ed033's Note - it's all a guess, even from 'academic' sources.


2.) 26 Nov 2017 22:47:38
I get what you are saying hsf. But I am talking about people that are saying that you can't fly from a to b as the flights don't exist even though the air lines say they do. Plus when emergency situations arise the flight paths which are taken make no sense whatsoever. Or just refuelling at point c.


3.) 27 Nov 2017 23:41:35
Evening all,

I consider myself pretty open minded but I do struggle with the flat earth theory. Although, it is very interesting. I have a mate who's a 'militant' flat earther. Some of what he says begs a lot of questions but I do struggle to make the leap.

I would love to hear as many peoples opinions and reasons for or against flat earth as possible. Ideally without having to put up with any shouting, swearing, insults and drunken ranting, which is how this subject normally ends with my mate.

I remember someone on here, a while back, mentioning there are things/ islands/ structures in the oceans that aren't on our publicly viewed maps or globes. Could this be why planes don't fly direct to some of the destinations mentioned in the video? I admit, I'm baffled by it.

It's a very intriguing subject.


4.) 28 Nov 2017 01:18:07
Ok, so I was flying to America when I was 13, going to Orlando Florida. But we have to go via Cleveland (not even in the remote area of Florida) We did this because we hit what's known as an "Air pocket", which made the plane freefall for about 6,000 feet. It was genuinely scary, but it happens. The reason we got diverted was to avoid any more of that.

They make sense when you look into the climatology side.

{Ed033's Note - You have to watch the video hsf not assume you know the answer is "Air pockets".


5.) 28 Nov 2017 01:19:24
www.youtube.com/watch?v=XicLxtkyS-I

And no guys, Joe Rogan is not a shill, he's not a misinformation agent and he's NOT being paid to say all of this.
He became educated and realised that what he was believing was completely fictional.


6.) 28 Nov 2017 06:06:35
Ed, I'm not ignoring the video, I'm giving a personal anecdote about why my flight was diverted.

The video doesn't have any evidence anyway, it's all hypothetical and misinformed.

It also makes it even more laughable, when the Flat Earth believers announce they are not religious, but then fail to realise that the Flat Earth movement started as a religious movement against Science thanks to the Book of Genesis.

Video's like this remind me of that time that Rapper went on top of a Hill and said he shouldn't be able to see Manhattan from there, but he could.
He failed to take into consideration that anything above 15 stories high would negate the natural curve of the planet, because it rises above it. But could he see the actual land mass of Manhattan Island? Nope, which is what the curvature states.

himawari8.nict.go.jp/
This website is a website which is dedicated to the Himawari 8 Satellite, it orbits around the Earth at a distance of over 20,000 miles and takes pictures of the Earth in full every 10 minutes. No, it's not fake

youtube.com/watch?v=Eya6IfVTU1Q
This is the launch coverage of said Satellite. go to 29:50 to see the actual launch.


7.) 28 Nov 2017 23:48:35
Not quite sure what your diverted flight has to do with the flat earth conversation?


8.) 29 Nov 2017 18:50:38
Rian, he mentioned about strange flight paths and diversions which "don't make sense". So I explained my experience of a flight being diverted and why.

{Ed033's Note - The original post was about flights being diverted thousands of miles out of their flight path for no good reason, which doesn't make sense if correct. What you should have done hsf is debunked these thousands of miles diversions. instead you side tracked the original post with a reply about air pockets, which is insignificant to the original post.


9.) 29 Nov 2017 20:38:14
p1, it is a fascinating subject when you introduce the apparent anomalies with some flights.

I came across an interesting site that claims to debunk the flat earth theories. You might find it worth a look. All the best.

goo.gl/U0GUP

{Ed033's Note - Thanks Rian.


10.) 30 Nov 2017 19:05:14
The other part about this was if some flights are fake what do the flight operator's gain from offering flights what don't exist? And also I think this video touches on the detours not making sense on a globe but makes sense on the flat earth model. Not that I believe the flat earth stuff but sometimes the things they bring up can be interesting.


11.) 30 Nov 2017 19:15:11
Yeah thanks rian interesting.


 

 

08 Nov 2017 23:25:28
Ed33 what do you make of the priti patel situation with Israel? Why would we be bumming up to them right now and in secret.

p1

{Ed033's Note - There has always been secret meetings between UK and Israel. The real question is why are they letting stuff out now.

We see other stuff that has been let out that has always been going on such as the pedo stuff (even if they try to hide it as sexual harassment).

Is stuff being let out because there is a split in the elite? Or is this the beginning of the grand plan to move all of us fairly quickly into the total control, new transhuman world order?


 

 

23 Feb 2016 17:21:04
Ed have you seen bent lights posts on fb if so what do you think about his research.

p1

{Ed033's Note - i don't think much to it. it's like saying there are extra terrestrials in clouds when you see a some type of face in a cloud.


1.) 23 Feb 2016 22:11:19
Bull then in your opinion.

{Ed033's Note - of course. If you think about it, so many patterns get formed with the light through the water that eventually you are going to see what might look like a bit of a face.


 

 

18 Feb 2016 18:09:46
Ed what's your take on Cameron trying to get a deal with the EU which nobody is interested in. And if he wins or fails if England or the uk leave the EU surely this would cause an upset for the controllers.

p1

{Ed033's Note - All Cameron is doing is trying to get some concessions from the EU by saying this bull that if he gets these concessions then the British people may be more likely to vote to stay in the EU. But all this is about is Cameron being told to try to con the EU into giving concessions.

If the controllers want UK to stay in the EU, they'll rig the vote, but we already know that in a decade's time and beyond, the controllers will be moving European countries into becoming Islamic states (it's already started if you haven't noticed.)

In 2016 they are going to attempt to bring in 50 million people from Africa (North Africa is already islamic) and people from The Middle East into the EU. The 50 million will be made up of relatives of the people already here and new people coming in and their relatives.

And each year from now on they will be bringing in millions more and they'll be no end to it. How can we afford it and where are they going to live and will it not lead to the ruination of Europe?

Dave Rubin interview: 'Islamification' of Europe and Immigration into Europe


1.) 18 Feb 2016 22:02:51
Yeah but in my view I think we will leave the eu.


2.) 19 Feb 2016 15:32:54
P1 I really hope you are rite.


3.) 20 Feb 2016 09:33:07
Hi ed, had typed out a big reply but it doesn't seem to have sent, anyway,

You've said couple times about Europe becoming an Islamic state and the number of people recently being moved into Europe to make this happen in maybe 10+ years.

How do you see it coming around? Acts passed through parliament? Fighting in the streets until a ceasefire and deal is made?

If it were to happen do you think the areas that become an Islamic state would be governed like a Saudi Arabia/ Qatar or would it be along the lines of an Isis held territory in Iraq/ Syria?

Also you think there would be some sort of amnesty for those who didn't want to live in such conditions to move on to an area where they can believe whatever they want?

Finally why do you think the "ones in charge" have decided that an Islamic state is the best way to go? Provides more control? Or people easily led?

I know it's lots of guess work but quite interesting.

Cheers.

{Ed033's Note - Just my opinion but, first of all, we have to go back to the roman empire and realise that the zionists had the eventual aim of taking it over. When the roman empire became 'the church' and 'the church' was running things in Europe, at some point the zionists did take over but i don't know exactly when.

'The church' actually were the ones that took over Islam and used it and still uses it as zionists to get muslims to do their bidding for them (this is why muslims are so useful to the zionists), or at least that is what the zionists want to believe.

zionists have been trying to ruin Europe and genocide europeans for hundreds of years and then some and their religion demands it.
The zionists hate all europeans for at least 2 reasons.
1. they see them as competition

2. Jews have been thrown out of Europe over 100 times because every time they go into any country in Europe, they try to ruin it. The reason why all jews get thrown out is because they don't know which of the jews are the zionists ruining things.

How are the zionists going to turn european countries into islamic states?

One answer is how did the jews takeover Palestine and 'ethnically cleanse'/genocide the indigenous Palestinians

The answer is not, 'They wouldn’t do that'
The answer is not, 'The Jews will become Muslims'
The answer is not, 'The Jews will live like Palestinians'

The answer is that you keep bringing jews into Palestine and accommodate the Jews according to their religion.

They’ll just keep bringing muslims in and accommodate them according to their religion. This will happen through government legislation. This means Pork legislation, Alcohol legislation, Holy Holiday legislation, and bringing in any legislation that benefits muslims to the detriment of europeans, building of Mosques, Bringing in Sharia Law etc.

Any pushback from Europeans will turn muslims into radical muslims, which is the agenda, as only radical muslims will live in a totalitarian state. The ultimate aim of 'the controllers' is total control, something Europeans won't go along with but radical muslims will.

You would expect each country in Europe that has enough muslims/africans in it, to be governed like Saudi Arabia (Wahhabi-zionism).

If, in any of the european countries a big fight breaks out (with ISIS fighters already in Europe), you would expect some type of military action to be brought in who would not be on the side of the Europeans (although the military may not know this as they’ll do as they’re ordered). The military action may be a combination of drone strikes, jet fighter attacks, helicopter gunships, hired mercenaries (blackwater/XE), NATO forces.


4.) 20 Feb 2016 17:44:00
Thanks for that ed, going to read up on the Zionist element. Really interesting and potentially grim situation. Maybe use it as a reason to convince my wife to pack up and disappear into the wilderness of Alaska 😝.

{Ed033's Note - If we already have tens of thousands of people living on the streets of Europe, why don't the governments of Europe help those European people?

The wilderness of Alaska sounds fun.


5.) 20 Feb 2016 18:47:32
That's what really annoys me with all those adverts for £3 per month or whatever to help someone in some part of Africa or the 3/ 4 times a year the BBC do a fund raiser for Syria or wherever. The state Britain is in that's never really in the news or put out in the mainstream. Through work the conditions I have seen people, adults and children here living in a so called first world country is a disgrace. We should be using all this money from these fundraisers to sort out our own problems before trying to help all the other places.
Just my two cents worth.


6.) 21 Feb 2016 18:13:50
For any modern country that is in the top economies of the world to have people sleeping on the streets is a disgrace. True socialism is the war on poverty. Something forgotten by modern "socialists"


7.) 21 Feb 2016 21:34:39
The CPS are already working with sharia courts and letting them deal with cases of domestic violence outside of the CPS . So that tells you that this country is perfectly ok with the beating and gang raping of women. Like you say the British idea of been up in arms is a low level grumble then forget as the goal posts keep getting wider. If you add all this to the fact that the Muslims here are out breeding the white British makes me wonder how the hell we stand a chance.


8.) 21 Feb 2016 21:38:38
Kim, you are also spot on and people forget that as we get 98% of media cover that focus on the poor 'refugees'. It's bollocks there is no need for anyone to be homeless on the streets of the U.K. If you made the same decisions on a domestic level then you would stop buying your own children food and clothes and send them to the neighbors children because they have whined a little louder.


9.) 21 Feb 2016 18:14:44
For any modern country that is in the top economies of the world to have people sleeping on the streets is a disgrace. True socialism is the war on poverty. Something forgotten by modern "socialists"


10.) 22 Feb 2016 16:32:23
How can you be expected to sort out the rest of the worlds problems when you neglect your own.

Its not just the homeless. Its drug addicts. People with mental illness. Returning veterans who are just abandoned (many of them with psychological problems who form a part of the homeless) repeat offending criminals.

There are plenty of people who need help in this country that do not get it.

I'm not saying neglect the rest of the world. But sort your own issues out first.


11.) 23 Feb 2016 18:24:18
but you are not allowed to air those type of views in your own country kim, without being told you are racists or selfish etc. the trouble is a world being run by money men who don't give a xxxx about those below them. starvation and homelessness in the world dosent need to exist they allow it to exist. Also why do those adverts claim that £2 a month is all that's required when we know they need a hell of a lot more than that. all the politicians can do is quote a lot of made up facts and figures instead of dealing with these problems, and where is "dave" he is running around Europe bleating about the eu, a small comfort i'm sure for the homeless as they try and find a safe spot to bed down in for the night, wake up next morning cold and hungry, that's if they have not been attacked during the night. And they call it "great" Britain, what's so "great" about it?


 

 

 

p1 has no Banter Posts

 

 

p1's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

30 Nov 2017 19:15:11
Yeah thanks rian interesting.

p1

 

 

Click To View This Thread

30 Nov 2017 19:05:14
The other part about this was if some flights are fake what do the flight operator's gain from offering flights what don't exist? And also I think this video touches on the detours not making sense on a globe but makes sense on the flat earth model. Not that I believe the flat earth stuff but sometimes the things they bring up can be interesting.

p1

 

 

Click To View This Thread

26 Nov 2017 22:47:38
I get what you are saying hsf. But I am talking about people that are saying that you can't fly from a to b as the flights don't exist even though the air lines say they do. Plus when emergency situations arise the flight paths which are taken make no sense whatsoever. Or just refuelling at point c.

p1

 

 

Click To View This Thread

08 Nov 2017 23:27:38
Was there not more windows or port holes on one of them can't remember which. But surely that proves which one sank.

p1

{Ed033's Note - yes, it's provable that the Olympic was sunk as the Olympic and Titanic were not exactly the same including different numbers of port holes.


 

 

Click To View This Thread

24 Sep 2017 16:11:16
Would the Syrian missile testing be the new way in ed.

p1

{Ed033's Note - maybe


 

 

 

p1 has no Banter Replies